MSNBC: Oops!!!

American Thinker has an article today that shows just how blatantly dishonest MSNBC (Mainstream Snarky Nutjob Barack Channel) is in their coverage of law-abiding citizens exercising their rights under the Second Amendment at some town hall meetings. Watch this:



And here's the picture of that gun toting white racist:




Just a bit of FYI for the dope in the middle of the panel on the video. He mentioned "Squeaky" Fromme and Mark Hinckley...it was JOHN Hinckley who tried to assassinate Reagan. Get your facts straight, you twerp!

Alert!! 'Armed Mob' Will be Buzzword Tonight

As I type this, I'm sitting in front of my t.v. with my laptop watching the coverage about Obama's upcoming town hall meeting in New Hampshire. What I've seen on PMSNBC is what prompted me to run for the laptop.

The camera panned crowds on both sides of the debate near the high school where BHO is set to speak in about an hour. In the anti-healtcare crowd, the camera picked up a fellow freedom fighter holding a sign that read "It's time to water the tree of liberty." Strapped to his thigh, in plain view, was his pistol.

Carlos Watson of PMSNBC went nuclear. "How can this man do this?" he asked the field reporter covering the event on a live feed.

"Evidently, the law here says that since he isn't concealing it, he can carry it. The gun is registered to the man, and he is on private property [The man was on a church's property and had permission to be there from the church.], so the law says he can do this." The field reporter must not have heard about THE SECOND AMENDMENT.

Ol' Carlos was just in total disbelief. He still wonders why he is allowed to remain there and why the Secret Service isn't asking him to leave. HEY CARLOS!!! THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!!!

Of course, following right on the heels of this, Carlos has a couple of Obama supporters in the studio to ask why the Secret Service hasn't swept the area. The two mushheads speculated that the man would most likely be escorted away from the area for security reasons. "Why can't they make him leave now?" the broad on the panel asked. BECAUSE HE'S NOT VIOLATING ANY LAWS, YOU TWIT!!!

I'm betting that tonight's news headlines will read "President Met With Armed Mob."

Go ahead; make my day!

The Second Amendment: We May Have a Convert!!

The following is a post from American Thinker, authored by Robin of Berkeley, not exactly a conservative stronghold. It's long, but stick with it. It proves there's hope.

Why Do Liberals Bleed?

By Robin of Berkeley

I've been thinking about learning how to fire a gun, maybe even buying one. Now if you are a lifelong conservative, Red State dweller, and NRA member, you might be thinking, "Big yawn. What's next? She'll be telling us what she had for breakfast?"

So let me try to convey to you the enormousness, the Alice in Wonderland quality of my even posing the question, something I've never, ever considered in my life. No one I know owns a gun. I've never seen a gun (well on a holster of a police officer but I never wanted to get up close and personal with it). I have given lots of good money over the years for gun control. Learning to fire a gun seems as ludicrous as deciding to take up brain surgery.

But, I am rethinking absolutely everything. There is not a single thing that I believed, that I held absolute and holy, that is not up for grabs. My brain is in a tizzy 24/7 and I don't know if up is down, or if east is west.

And the thought about a gun just came to me last week when I was listening to talk radio. A caller related how an armed citizen in the South stopped a take over robbery in a fast food restaurant. A light went on in my head. Suddenly I realized that the Red States may be on to something: the police are strongly supported, the citizens have guns, and, therefore, the gangsters may be a little reluctant to take over the local Burger King.

Contrast that to the Blue States where few liberals own guns and the police are being emasculated. You may have heard of the horrendous case in Oakland where four cops were killed by a known felon, on a parole violation for child rape. But the powers that be in Oakland sent out the message to the police to make nice and not scare the populace, so the officers never drew their guns when approaching this felon. (Anyone else notice how the Left is slowly but surely disarming the police and military, situation-by-situation?) When I expressed my heartfelt grief to a friend about the deaths of these brave officers, he said, "The man who shot them was a human being too."

(I'd like to say that, as a psychotherapist, I responded in a sophisticated and psychologically crafty manner. No such luck. I almost blew a gasket, turned bright red, and said with barely contained anger, "He lost his claim to be human when he raped a child." To the friend's credit -- and perhaps some fear on his part -- he shut up.)

So what I realized during the talk show is that in places like Berkeley, only the criminals have the power. Not only do they have the power of guns, they are supported by several thousand brainwashed zombies who give the green light to criminals because they are the victims of someone else's "privilege" and "supremacy" and "imperialism." (Although I was a leftist until recently, I was the rare exception: I never excused crime because of the bad guy's race, creed, age, sex, or daddy being a meanie.)

I recall vividly what a Berkeley police officer once told me:

"Berkeley is a city of victims. You try to understand the street people and the criminals and sit down and talk to them and then they hit you on the head and steal your purse. The police come and then you refuse to press charges. The criminals know this and prey on you."

And he's right: almost everyone I know has been a victim of some awful crime, from being in restaurants during takeover robberies (not uncommon here), to being robbed at gunpoint, to being assaulted for no other reason except a thrill for the assailants. A neighbor, who had lived all over the world, once said to me, "Berkeley is the most dangerous place I've ever lived." Her husband was robbed at gunpoint as were almost all her friends. She couldn't wait to get out of here.

I wish I could say I'm an exception to the victim rule. But several years ago I was coming out of a restaurant in a decent area and was mugged. As Gavin de Becker states in his seminal book, The Gift of Fear, (which I, unfortunately, read after the fact), victims generally sense when they're about to be victimized but ignore the signs in order to be nice and not judgmental. This was my situation exactly. I could tell right away that the guy looked sinister. But it was a major street, at high noon, and I didn't want to seem racist, so I turned the corner a few feet to reach my car, and a minute later, had my purse stolen as well as all my feelings of being safe in the world.

I'll spare you (and me) the horrible details, but the incident ended with my having a broken nose and two black eyes, and needing surgery for the nose several days later. People wrote bad checks and stole rental cars in my name for a year afterwards. I developed a fear not only of people, but of the phone and the mail, as every day was another reminder of what happened.

Witness the response of a left wing friend, Judy, when I told her I was mugged. She said, and I quote, "I don't think what you went through was so bad. And anyway he was a victim too." (Maybe it's a good thing I wasn't armed back then.)

So I'm asking myself whether I should become armed, and I'm also wondering why so many "educated" people (I might have just answered my own question) put up with crime infested streets? Why are the biggest protests against the cops? Why are the innocent viewed as guilty, and the guilty innocent? Why is no one up in arms about liberals literally bleeding?

Then it occurred to me: Stockholm Syndrome, the same brainwashing that turned Berkeley resident Patty Hearst into Tania the bank robber. She was tortured, sexually abused, and kept in isolation by the far left group, the Symbionese Liberation Army (kissing cousins of Bill and Bernadine's Weather Underground). Successfully brainwashed, she joined their twisted and sick "army."

In the real Stockholm, the hostages were locked in a vault for days, came to "love" their captors in that perverted way that an abused woman loves her husband, and refused to testify against them in court. One even became engaged to her captor.

SS (good acronym, huh?) is rooted in a basic, primordial instinct for self protection in the wake of extraordinary trauma and terror. To survive, the victim identifies with the captors and merges psychologically with them. But SS takes on a life of its own when victims stop seeing their own humanity and want only to serve the abuser.

Living in places like Berkeley, being force fed propaganda, with police afraid to protect you, your friends unsympathetic, and no one armed, SS can spread like a virus. What starts out as compassion morphs into complicity. Occasionally there may be someone, like me, who snaps out of the trance they've been in for decades. After all, Tania woke up and became Patty Hearst again and, interestingly, married her bodyguard. (I bet that they own a whole lot of weapons.) But she had to leave Berkeley for a leafy, sheltered life elsewhere to do this.

But then again, I never bought into the notion of collective guilt, that groups of people are guilty because of the color of their skin, and individuals are exonerated because of some protected victim status. I'm the rare bird. In Berkeley, most people are so over identified with their ideology, that their logical, questioning minds have flown the coop along with a God-given knowledge, possessed by every 5 year old, of right and wrong.

As a good, loyal liberal, I always expected others to take care of me. If I gave my unqualified loyalty to the system, I could sleep well at night. But now, with victims left bleeding, a dangerously naive government, and sheep like masses, I see the absurdity of my thinking.

I heard a philosopher once say that one of the biggest existential tasks of life is giving up the fantasy of the ultimate rescuer. Liberalism reinforced this fantasy for me, as it does for so many others. Now I see the truth: We come into this world alone, and we will leave it alone. When we live our lives in the back seat of the car expecting Daddy to drive us, we only have a child's view of the world.

On that very dark day in November years ago when I became an object of someone's evil and inhumanity, I glimpsed a truth I never wanted to see: that there really is no protection, not in the way I had always thought, not by other flawed humans. I didn't know what to do with this insight until 1 1/2 years ago when I discovered that there were others out there like me, that there was something called conservatism, and now slowly but surely the pieces are coming together for me, one by one.

As I continue on the path to independence and personal responsibility, perhaps looking to myself for protection is another step on my journey.

The Second Amendment in Chicago

Yesterday, the 7th circuit Court of Appeals upheld a handgun ban in Chicago and neighboring Oak Park. Their reason? The Second Amendment is not adequate basis for filing lawsuits. HUH??

This just makes me crazy. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that local handgun bans are unconstitutional, but a little thing like the Constitution doesn't seem to matter to the Handgun Control, Inc. crowd. And isn't it just a little ironic that this all came from Barry's home state and beloved city? Could it be a subliminal message being put out there? Who knows.

The Second Amendment was put in place to allow law-abiding citizens the right to protect themselves against oppression and tyranny. Without the Second Amendment, we can't defend the others. That's why Hitler disarmed the citizenry. He didn't have much trouble taking over then, did he?

And let's look at the Windy City. I've never been there, but from what I've been told by people who have, there are certain sections of town and certain times of night that you would not want to be out on the streets. I wonder how the gun grabbers would feel if they were to encounter a little gang banger on the street pointing a Glock in their faces. Do you think that they would continue to believe that gun was obtained legally? Oh, they probably would.

Of course, it would all be due to how misunderstood the youth of today are. Misunderstood? Give me a break! Most parents today have no spine. If my mother had gotten a call from jail when I was 11 and 12 years old, I'd have been begging the cops to keep me there. Today's kids (and some parents) don't care. To them, getting busted for armed robbery or killing a rival gang member is a badge of honor. This is what years of liberal programs have done.

If I'm walking down the street and some punk decides to mess with me or my family, I hope he feels lucky. He'll meet my little friend.